EPRO101 Unpacking Childhood Regulatory :
| TITLE | Unpacking the Early Childhood Australian Regulatory Frameworks | ||||||
| WEIGHTING | 30% | LENGTH | 1800 words | LEARNING OUTCOMES | a. and c. | DUE | Week 8 |
Compile a written report (word document) that:
- Identifies and outlines the early childhood legislation and regulatory considerations for early childhood settings in the Australian context.
- Describes the National Quality Standards, Quality Areas and Rating Process.
- Identifies and describes all the components of the Approved Learning Frameworks (EYLF & MTOP)
- Identifies and describes all the components of the Australian Curriculum Foundation stage.
- Outlines the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers.
- Evaluates the importance and influence the National Quality Framework, Australian Curriculum and Teacher Accreditation has upon the professional practice of early childhood teachers within early childhood services.
Rubric
EPRO101 Ass 2: Report
| EPRO101 Ass 2: Report | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganisation, Presentation and Structure | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding organisation, presentation, structure and following of assessment requirements. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior organisation, presentation, structure and following of assessment requirements. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average organisation, presentation, structure and following of assessment requirements. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory organisation, presentation, structure and following of assessment requirements. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory organisation, presentation, structure and following of assessment requirements. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch, Reading, Resources and Literature | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis, and evaluation is demonstrated. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Evidence of research, reading, and evaluation is demonstrated. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Evidence of research and reading is demonstrated. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Minimal evidence of research and reading is demonstrated. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencing Protocols | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding use of academic referencing system with minor in-text and no reference list errors. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior use of academic referencing system with minor in-text or reference list errors. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average use of academic referencing system with minimal in-text or reference list errors. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory use of academic referencing system with several in-text or reference list errors. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory use of academic referencing system with numerous in-text or reference list errors. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Writing/Language | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Language use is outstanding with minor grammatical, spelling, word choice, syntax errors. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Language use is superior with minor grammatical, spelling, word choice, syntax errors. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Language use is above average with minimal grammatical, spelling, word choice, syntax errors. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Language use is satisfactory with several grammatical, spelling, word choice, syntax errors. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Language use is unsatisfactory with numerous grammatical, spelling, word choice, syntax errors | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge Application and Synthesis of Understanding – Legislative and Regulatory Considerations | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding identification and outline of the early childhood legislative and regulatory considerations for early childhood settings in the Australian context. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior identification and outline of the early childhood legislative and regulatory considerations for early childhood settings in the Australian context. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average identification and outline of the early childhood legislative and regulatory considerations for early childhood settings in the Australian context. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory identification and outline of the early childhood legislative and regulatory considerations for early childhood settings in the Australian context. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory identification and outline of the early childhood legislative and regulatory considerations for early childhood settings in the Australian context. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge Application and Synthesis of Understanding – National Quality Standards | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding description of the National Quality Standards, Quality Areas and Rating Process. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior description of the National Quality Standards, Quality Areas and Rating Process. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average description of the National Quality Standards, Quality Areas and Rating Process. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory description of the National Quality Standards, Quality Areas and Rating Process. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory description of the National Quality Standards, Quality Areas and Rating Process. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge Application and Synthesis of Understanding – Approved Learning Frameworks | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding identification and description of all the components of the Approved Learning Frameworks (EYLF & MTOP) 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior identification and description of all the components of the Approved Learning Frameworks (EYLF & MTOP) 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average identification and description of all the components of the Approved Learning Frameworks (EYLF & MTOP) 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory identification and description of all the components of the Approved Learning Frameworks (EYLF & MTOP) 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory identification and description of all the components of the Approved Learning Frameworks (EYLF & MTOP) | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge Application and Synthesis of Understanding – Australian Curriculum | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding identification and description of all the all the components of the Australian Curriculum Foundation stage. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior identification and description of all the all the components of the Australian Curriculum Foundation stage. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average identification and description of all the all the components of the Australian Curriculum Foundation stage. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory identification and description of all the all the components of the Australian Curriculum Foundation stage. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory identification and description of all the all the components of the Australian Curriculum Foundation stage. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge Application and Synthesis of Understanding – Teaching Standards | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding discussion of the regulatory requirements of teachers in relation to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior discussion of the regulatory requirements of teachers in relation to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average discussion of the regulatory requirements of teachers in relation to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory discussion of the regulatory requirements of teachers in relation to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory discussion of the regulatory requirements of teachers in relation to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge Application and Synthesis of Understanding – Professional Practice | 10 to >8.5 pts High Distinction Outstanding evaluation of the importance and influence the National Quality Framework, Australian Curriculum and Teacher Accreditation has upon the professional practice of early childhood teachers within early childhood services. 8.5 to >7.5 pts Distinction Superior evaluation of the importance and influence the National Quality Framework, Australian Curriculum and Teacher Accreditation has upon the professional practice of early childhood teachers within early childhood services. 7.5 to >6.5 pts Credit Above average evaluation of the importance and influence the National Quality Framework, Australian Curriculum and Teacher Accreditation has upon the professional practice of early childhood teachers within early childhood services. 6.5 to >4.5 pts Pass Satisfactory evaluation of the importance and influence the National Quality Framework, Australian Curriculum and Teacher Accreditation has upon the professional practice of early childhood teachers within early childhood services. 4.5 to >0 pts Fail Unsatisfactory evaluation of the importance and influence the National Quality Framework, Australian Curriculum and Teacher Accreditation has upon the professional practice of early childhood teachers within early childhood services. | 10 pts |
| Total Points: 100 | ||
Visit:https://auspali.info/
Also visit:https://www.notesnepal.com/archives/767
YOUR COMMENT