BMB4001M Student Assessment

BMB4001M Student Assessment :

For solution: +610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

Module Code		BMB4001M	Module Title	David Kelsey
Level		4	Module Tutor
Credit Value of Module		20	Feedback Process	Online via Grademark
Type o	f Submission	Essay	Expected Feedback Date	Friday 16th December 2022 at 5pm
Assessment Task		1
Weighting		70% (2500 words)
Due Date		Friday 25th November 2022 (week 9) at 12noon   Please note that this is Greenwich Mean Time (GMT). If you live in another time zone then you must still submit by the date above.
Assessment Regulations
In order to pass the module, students must achieve at least a mark of 20 in each component and an overall pass mark.
Module Specific Requirements
To be successful in the module students should be able to:   Explain key concepts relating to responsible businessIdentify aspects within the ongoing academic debate regarding responsible businessApply ideas from the ongoing academic debate regarding responsible business to ‘real- world’ business examples
Learning Outcomes
See module specification for details: the module aligns with PLOs from across the York Business School suite of programmes.
Assignment Description
Write an essay on the following title:   To what extent is responsibility a feature of an organisation’s/industry’s (delete as appropriate) behaviour? An analysis of (add specifics e.g. ‘Primark’)
Additional Information
You can choose to write your essay from either a business (e.g. Primark) or an industry (e.g. the fashion industry) perspective.   Use concepts from the module to develop this full assessment and support your claims throughout. Support in this context means using examples from the organisation or industry, as well as quality academic sources/literature. You must use the York St John University approach to Harvard referencing. Follow the Cite Them Right guide for details: https://www- citethemrightonline-com.yorksj.idm.oclc.org/

You should consider features of capitalism. Assess whether the module of BMB4001M Student Assessment content supports a deeper understanding of why businesses behave as they do.

Consider the following questions:

• Is there evidence of responsibility or irresponsibility?
• How and why do you believe it is responsible or irresponsible, and to what extent?
• What evidence can be used to support your points?

You could use the module content to include recommendations for the future.

Try to develop a cohesive and coherent piece of work of BMB4001M Student Assessment in an academic style. Use the assessment details, marking criteria, and the support throughout the module to support you in this.

Remember to:

1. Write formally and clearly
2. Avoid the use of the first person (e.g. “I think that”)
3. Have a clear sense of focus throughout
4. Demonstrate a balanced understanding
5. Use appropriate academic sources

Please ensure that you use the document “ BMB4001M Student Assessment Assessment 1 PRBB Guidance” to support your approach. You should also use the seminar time to discuss work with your tutor.

Business Assessment Descriptors (Undergraduate levels 4, 5, and 6)

SUMMARY DESCRIPTOR: Learning accredited at undergraduate will reflect the ability to display mastery of a complex and specialised area of knowledge and skills, employing advanced skills to conduct research or advanced technical/professional activity, accepting accountability for related decision-making, including use of supervision.

	PASS GRADES					FAIL GRADES
	1st (100-85) – Exemplary.	1st (84 – 70) – Excellent.	2:1 (69 – 60) – Very good.	2:2 (59 – 50) – Good.	3rd (49 – 40) – Sufficient.	(39 – 20) – Insufficient.	(19 – 0) – Minimal to None.
SUMMARY DESCRIPTOR: Learning accredited at undergraduate will reflect the ability to display mastery of a complex and specialised area of knowledge and skills, employing advanced skills to conduct research or advanced technical/professional activity, accepting accountability for related decision-making, including use of supervision.
General Characteristics (UG)
Knowledge &	You have shown	You have shown excellent	You have demonstrated a very	You have demonstrated a good	You have demonstrated a	Your knowledge and	Your knowledge and
understanding	exemplary knowledge and	knowledge and understanding	good breadth and depth of	breadth and depth of subject	sufficient depth of knowledge	understanding of material	understanding of the
e.g., knowledge	understanding of material	of material taught in this	knowledge and understanding	knowledge and understanding	and understanding in key	taught in this module	subject are inadequate, without
and	taught in this module, well	module, well beyond the	of material taught in this	of material taught in this	aspects of the field of study,	are below the threshold	the required breadth or depth,
understanding	beyond the threshold	threshold expectation of	module, showing a clear,	module, which are sometimes	sufficient to deal with	standard and insufficient to	with deficiencies in key areas.
of material	expectation of a student at this	a student at this level.	critical insight.	balanced towards the	terminology, facts, and	deal with some key aspects of
taught in the	level.			descriptive rather than the	concepts.	the subject.
module.				critical or analytical.
Research &	You have shown exemplary	You extensively engage with	You have drawn on relevant	Your research is limited to	You have rarely drawn on	Little to no use of academic	You have not drawn on any
Evidence	levels of research, engaging	the reading list and show	module material, as well as	module material and restricted	academic sources. Your work	sources. Your work has not	academic sources Your work
e.g.,	with the reading list, and	strong relevant independent	appropriate academic sources	in scope. Your work does not	rarely engages with relevant	engaged with relevant reading	has not engaged with relevant
engagement	shown outstanding relevant	research that furthers the	from your own independent	demonstrate any reading of	reading material either within	material from the module or	reading material from the
with academic	independent research that	module material. Your work	research. Your work uses	academic sources that goes	or beyond module material.	beyond.	module or beyond.
literature.	furthers the module material.	uses ample high-quality	appropriate high-quality	beyond the module material,
	Your work uses ample high-	academic sources which are	academic sources which are	and any additional sources that
	quality academic sources	both appropriate for your	largely appropriate for your	you have used are of poor
	which are both appropriate for	argument and far reaching	argument and reach beyond	quality or inappropriate.
	your argument and far reaching	beyond module material.	module material.
	beyond module material.
Analysis &	You have made consistent	You have made consistent,	You have demonstrated the	You have argued logically,	You have shown the ability to	You can provide explanations,	Your arguments and
Evaluation	logical, coherently developed,	logical, coherently developed,	ability to make coherent,	with supporting evidence, and	devise and sustain an	but your argument is neither	explanations are weak and/or
e.g., logic and	and substantiated arguments,	and substantiated arguments,	substantiated arguments, as	have demonstrated the ability	argument, with some	sustained nor sufficiently	poorly constructed, and you are
argument;	and have demonstrated the	and have demonstrated the	well as the ability to consider,	to consider and evaluate a	consideration of alternative	supported by alternative	not able to critically evaluate
analytical	ability to systematically	ability to systematically	critically evaluate	range of views and	views and ability to explain	views.	the arguments of others or
reflections;	consider, critically evaluate	consider, critically evaluate	and synthesise a range of	information. You have clearly	often complex matters and		consider alternative views
organisation	and synthesise a	and synthesise a wide range of	views and information	and consistently explained	ideas.		required at this level.
and	comprehensive range of views	views and information (beyond	(appropriate to the expected	complex matters and ideas.
communication	and information (substantially	the expected level). You have	level). You have demonstrated
of ideas and	beyond the expected level).	demonstrated sophisticated	a thorough, perceptive, and
evidence.	You have demonstrated	perception, critical insight, and	thoughtful interpretation of
	sophisticated perception,	interpretation of complex	complex matters and ideas.
	critical insight, and	matters and ideas in most
	interpretation of complex	aspects of your work.
	matters and ideas in all aspects
	of the work.

Communicatio n & Academic Writing Style e.g., logic and structure; formatting; grammar.	You have shown an exemplary level in your academic writing style. An exemplary structure has been used to effectively communicate your point, and your work is grammatically and logically appropriate.	You have an engaging, academic writing style. Your work effectively communicates your point, is clearly structured, and is grammatically and logically appropriate.	Your writing style is clear and mostly academic. Your work effectively communicates your point but needs a more logical structure and/or grammatical improvement.	Your style is somewhat clear, but is sometimes colloquial. Your structure, grammar, and syntax need improvement and your work implies a lack of proof reading.	Your style often gets in the way of effectively communicating your meaning. Your writing is mostly colloquial, with frequent grammar and/or syntax errors which would have been prevented with proof reading. You may consider contacting our academic skills team for improvement.	Your style is unclear and prevents understanding of your point. Your writing is colloquial, non-academic, and in need of proof reading to correct frequent grammar and syntax errors. You may consider contacting our academic skills team for improvement.	Your style is minimal and very unclear, preventing understanding. Your writing is colloquial, non-academic, and in need of proof reading to correct frequent grammar and syntax errors. You may consider contacting our academic skills team for improvement.
Citations & Referencing. Harvard Referencing Style	You have cited and referenced all necessary ideas accurately in Harvard style.	You have cited and referenced all necessary ideas and the vast majority are accurate and in the Harvard style	You have cited everything but there are some errors in formatting. Take a look at the Harvard ‘quick guide’ or use ‘cite them right’ to help next time.	There are some errors in formatting and some missing citations. Take a look at the Harvard ‘quick guide’ or use ‘cite them right’ to help next time.	There are many citations that are missing, and/or there are significant mistakes in referencing style. Take a look at the Harvard ‘quick guide’ or use ‘cite them right’ to help next time.	You have not cited or referenced your work appropriately. Take a look at the Harvard ‘quick guide’ or use ‘cite them right’ to help next time.	Little to no attempt at referencing your work. Take a look at the Harvard ‘quick guide’ or use ‘cite them right’ to help next time.
Creativity & Originality	You have shown exemplary levels of originality of thought, and/or independence far beyond the expectation(s) of the level of study.	You have shown an excellent and sustained originality of thought, and/or evidence of substantial independent study.	You have shown very good examples(s) of originality of thought, and/or evidence of wide-ranging independent study.	You demonstrated good evidence of originality of thought, and/or clear evidence of study independent of set/ recommended material.	You have shown limited evidence of originality of thought, and/or study independent of set/recommended material.	You have shown very limited originality of thought and/or evidence of study independent of set/recommended material.	You have shown no originality of thought and/or evidence of independent study.
Graduate employability Skill: Problem Solving	You are exceptionally competent at autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems and you have demonstrated an outstanding ability to apply knowledge and methods to your solution far beyond the expectations of this level.	You are competent at autonomously identifying and defining a range of complex problems and you are excellent at applying knowledge and methods to your solution beyond the expectations of this level.	You are competent at autonomously identifying and defining a range of complex problems and you are very good at applying knowledge and methods to your solution appropriate at this level.	You are competent at autonomously identifying and defining complex problems and you are good at applying knowledge and methods to your solution appropriate at this level.	You are mostly competent at autonomously identifying and defining complex problems and you apply some knowledge and methods to your solution but this is often inconsistent.	You have not gained the skills required at this level of study. There are significant weaknesses evident which suggest that further development is needed in this area.	You have demonstrated little or no evidence of the required skills at this level.
Graduate employability skill: Practical	You have an exemplary ability to autonomously evaluate your own strengths and weaknesses, and you have shown an outstanding range of professional and practical attributes that are needed for graduate level employment.	You are able to show excellent autonomy in evaluating your own strengths and weaknesses, and you have shown an excellent range of professional and practical skills that are needed for graduate level employment.	You are very good at evaluating your own strengths and weaknesses, and you have shown a very good range of professional and practical skills that are needed for graduate level employment.	You are good at evaluating your own strengths and weaknesses, and you have shown a good range of professional and practical skills that are needed for graduate level employment.	You are able to recognise your own strengths and weaknesses, and you have shown some professional and practical skills that are needed for graduate level employment.	You have demonstrated insufficient evidence of the graduate skills identified in the programme specification. There are significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that you have not gained the skills necessary for students at this level.	You have demonstrated little or no evidence of the required graduate skills identified in the programme specification at this level.

Visit:https://auspali.info/

Also visit:https://www.notesnepal.com/archives/767

For solution: +610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

For solution:

WhatsApp

+610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

[email protected]