HI6005 Management in a Global Environment :

For solution: +610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

HOLMES INSTITUTE   FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester	T3 2022
Unit Code	HI6005
Unit Title	Management and Organisations in a Global Environment
Assessment Type	Group Assignment
Assessment Title	Appendix Writing and Group Research Report
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)	Students are required to research a topic from a list of topics provided based on topics discussed in lectures.   The research provided will provide more in-depth evidence of individual research on the topic, not only material which is provided within the lecture content.
Weight	40% of the total assessments
Total Marks	40 marks for group research paper
Word limit	Template for the Appendix, Not more than 3,000 words for the group research paper
Due Date	Friday of Week 10 (27 January 2023) at 11:59pm
Submission Guidelines	All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.The assignment must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers.Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.

Group assignment Specifications

Purpose:

This HI6005 Management in a Global Environment assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with a general framework of at least one management related topic. Students will be required to apply relevant theoretical concepts with the use of practical examples in most cases in a written research paper.

Details:

Organise yourselves into groups of 4 students.

Please choose from one of the following topics from the list (see below).

Research on the broad topic is a group activity and each student must contribute to that work. Each student in the group will then research, in depth an individual component drawn from the broad research topic. There are two parts in the group HI6005 Management in a Global Environment assignment:

• Appendix Writing
• Research Report Writing

Group Appendix Writing Guidelines and Specifications

You should form in a group of 4 students. Please use self-enrolment tool in BB. Note that once you do so, your group members are fixed and cannot be changed. The group size should be 4 only. It is essential that every member makes a significant valid academic contribution to the team result.

As you start to work on your group report, you are required to assimilate this Appendix, to be submitted via a link on the UNIT blackboard site in week 10, by Friday (27 January 2023) 11:59 pm.

What should be included in the appendix?

1. All the group member details-full name, student id numbers, contact phone numbers.
   1. The topic chosen for your group assignment
   1. Allocation of the tasks for each member in the group. You may utilise this format for the above:

Topic Chosen:
Student ID	First Name	Family Name	Contact Phone Number	Allocated Task(s)

• A Gantt chart showing the working plan towards completion of the group assignment. This chart must have every allocated task, deadlines and dates clearly stated.

[See Gantt chart example, feel free to choose your own style] GANTT CHART example:

• Each student to list at least five references and sources for their chosen part. [Final report must contain these references plus any others that are cited orused].

Student ID	References	Key theme / Reason for choosing this?
1.	1.
	2
	3
	4
	5
2.	1
	2
	3
	4
	5
3.	1
	2
	3
	4
	5
4.	1
	2
	3
	4
	5

• All the correspondence towards working on the group HI6005 Management in a Global Environment assignments must be submitted as part of this assessment, this would include but not limited to emails, WhatsApp messages, USB file exchanges, group discussion, text messages, etc.
  • Details of a minimum of five group meetings held to be provided. Each meeting must be documented in the following format

Meeting No. ……: Date …………………. Time ……………………

Student	ID	Name	Points discussed		If absent state the reason
1.
2.
3.
4.

8. Our group expectations are:

9. We experienced the following challenges during this assignment:

10. At the completion of the HI6005 Management in a Global Environment assignment we have the following insights:

Group tools

Your instructor chooses which communication and collaboration tools are available to your group. If you want to use a tool but don’t find on your group’s page, ask your instructor to enable it.

Group Tool	Description
File Exchange	Group members and instructors can share files in this area. All members can add and delete files, regardless of who added them.
Group Blog	In the group area, all members of a group can create entries for
	the same blog and build on each entry. All course members can read and comment on a group blog, but they can’t make posts unless they are members of the group. Instructors can choose to grade group blogs. All group members receive the same grade.
Group Journal	In the group area, all members of a group can view each other’s entries. Only group members and instructors can view a group journal. Instructors can choose to grade group journals. All group members receive the same grade.
Send Email	Group members can email individual members or the entire group.

You can’t create folders in file exchange. With your group, decide how you want to name files so that they are easier to locate in a long list.

Add a file to the file exchange

Group Tools > File Exchange > Add File

Add a name for file you want to upload. Browse for the file and submit.

You can also delete any file if you wish. On the File Exchange page, select Delete in the file’s menu. But it would be good to keep all the files for any future reference.

Group Blog

All the group members can discuss about the HI6005 Management in a Global Environment assignment by using Group Blog. Once you are allocated in a group, you can see this function.

Group > Group Tools > Group Blog > Create Blog Entry

Page 7 of 13 Marking Rubrics
		80% and above	70%-79%	60%-69%	50%-59%	0- 49%
		Excellent	Very Good	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
HI60					Name, ID,
		Name, ID, family	Name, ID, family		family name,
		name, contact	name, contact		contact number	Incomplete/in
		number,	number	Name, ID, family	entered only	correct
	Group member	allocated task	entered, unclear	name, contact	for few	information
	Details (1 mark)	entered	tasks	number entered	members	entered
	Topic chosen (1 mark)	Clearly	Topic	Topic	Topic	Unclear topic
		mentioned and	mentioned with	mentioned	mentioned
		described	clarity	briefly	vaguely
	Task allocation (1 mark)	Full chart
		completed with	Full chart
		individual	completed with
		names, ID’s and	individual	Individual	Unclear	Incomplete/in
		well explained	names, ID’s and	names, ID’s and	discussion of	correct tasks
		tasks with clarity	tasks explained	tasks explained	tasks	entered
	GANNT Chart (1 mark)	All components
		of chart				Incomplete/in
		completed,	All components	Most of the	Some	correct
		explained with	of chart	component	component	components
		clarity	completed	completed	missing	entered
	References (1 mark)	Each member
		listed five		Less than five	Less than 2
		references with	Each member	references	references
		appropriate	listed five	listed by each	listed by each	No references
		sources	references	member	member	listed
		All emails,	All emails,
		WhatsApp	WhatsApp
		messages, USB	messages, group
		files, group	discussions, text
		discussions, text	messages,	All emails and
		messages,	telephonic	telephonic
		telephonic	conversation	messages	Inadequate	No
	All	conversation	provided. USB	evidence	correspondence	correspondence
	Correspondence (1 mark)	provided	files missing	provided	submitted	submitted
			Four meeting
		All five meeting	details with
		details with all	some	Less than four	Inadequate
	Face to face	the information	information	meeting details	meeting details	No meeting
	meeting details (1 mark)	provided	provided	provide	provided	details
		Clearly stated	Stated
		expectations	expectations	Expectations	Some
	Group	from each of the	with some	listed without	expectations	Unclear or no
	Expectations (1 0m5aMrka)nagement an	member with d Organisations in a Gl	discussion obal Environment –	discussion Appendix and Resear	stated ch Report	statements

		adequate discussion
	Challenges (1 mark)	Challenges regarding time, technology, resources, abilities, information well explained	Some challenges explained	Challenges listed without explanation	Brief mention of challenges	Unclear or no Challenges
	Insights after completion (1 mark)	Well Summarised , well explained insights up to week 8	Insights summarised well	Insights mentioned without adequate discussion	Attempted to mention the insights	No mention of insights

Group Research Report Guidelines and Specifications

Group Research paper written report – worth 30% of your final grade and must be submitted on Friday of Week 10 (27 January 2023) at 11:59pm. The written report should begin with the broad research topic which is then followed by each individual component identified by the individual student who prepared it.

Your report is to be written as a business HI6005 Management in a Global Environment report. It must include:

• Executive summary
• Table of contents
• Section headings
• Paragraphing
• Page numbers
• ‘Who did what’ section (use below table as template)
• Reference list at the end of the report

To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students are responsible for the academic integrity of all components of the assignment. You need to complete the following table which identifies which student/students are responsible for the various sections of the assignment.

Assignment Section	Student/Students

This table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory component required before any grading is undertaken.

List of Topics (Choose one):

TOPIC 2   Corporate or Organisational Culture General Framework Discuss why corporate culture is such an important determinant of organisational success. Outline the dimensions commonly used in describing a particular organisation’s culture.   Individual Components Each individual should focus on one (or two) of the dimensions and identify a specific organisation noted for its emphasis of that dimension.Describe how that organisation stresses that particular component of organisation culture and comment on whether they have been successful [Note: Individual team members must choose different dimensions and thus outline different actual cases].

TOPIC 3 National Culture General Framework Discuss why an understanding of national culture is important for multi-national or trans-national corporations seeking to operate in a global business environment. Outline the dimensions commonly used in describing national culture. Individual Components   Each individual should choose a different country classifying it in terms of the commonly-used dimensions for describing national culture.   Choose the countries wisely so that differences can be highlighted. Each member should seek to find specific examples in their country of choice to illustrate the classification they have made.

TOPIC 6

The Hawthorne Studies General Framework

The Hawthorne studies had their origins in the Scientific School of Management and constituted a genuine attempt at discovery through research. By today’s standards there were deficiencies in the research which will be highlighted in the individual components of this topic.

In your introduction outline the overall context of the Hawthorne studies and in your conclusion, stress the significant outcomes from the studies notwithstanding the acknowledged defects in the research methodology.

Individual Components

1. The Illumination Studies: One member of the group chooses this phase of the studies.
2. The Relay Room Experiments: Another member of the group chooses this phase of the studies.
3. The Bank Wiring Experiments: The third member of the group choose this phase.

Apart from describing the phase you have chosen, you must identify the specific research methodological weaknesses inherent in that phase.

TOPIC 7

Stakeholder Relationship Management and its influence on Management Decision Making General Framework

Relationship management is one of the highest-level managerial functions. Use an example to illustrate poor relationship management and the outcome that resulted from it. Outline the four-step approach to stakeholder relationship management.

Individual Components

Construct an example to illustrate good stakeholder relationship management. Using your example:

1. Define the general external environment of your example, identifying stakeholders within it.
2. Define the specific external environment of your example, identifying stakeholders within it.
3. Discuss how the multi-advocacy approach to stakeholder relationship management would assist managers in decision making which is sensitive to managing stakeholder relationships.

TOPIC 12   Motivation Overview General Framework   Outline the meaning of motivation as it applies in the workplace.   Individual Components   Discuss this question: Can a manager instill motivation into employees or is motivation a process of drawing out something from employees? Discuss coaching.Provide a map of the various theories of work motivation and explain the map.Discuss John Holland theory of personality and job fit as an explanation of workmotivation. Describe the difference between a content theory and a process theory of motivation.

TOPIC 13   Motivation: Content Theories General Framework   Describe the difference between a content theory and a process theory of motivation citing examples of how some process theories, under criticism, have been reduced to content theories.   Individual Components   Discuss Maslow’s theory and detail the criticisms that have been levelled against it.Discuss Hertzberg’s theory and detail the criticism that have been levelled against it.Discuss McGregor’s theory of work motivation.Behavioural science research expects to be scrutinized and criticism levelled against it. Summarise with examples from Hofstede’s work through to the theories of motivation.

TOPIC 14   Motivation: Process Theories General Framework   Provide a map of the various theories of work motivation and explain the map distinguishing the differences between content and process theories of work motivation.

Individual Components   Discuss McClelland’s work and theories of work motivation.Discuss Goal Setting and its role in work motivation: the ‘Review & Agree’ Process.Discuss Equity Theory using examples.Discuss Expectancy Theory using examples.

TOPIC 15   Change Management General Framework Outline the “Calm-waters” and the “White-water rapids” metaphors for Change Management.   Individual Components

Discuss Kotter’s theory of Change Management.Discuss Force-Field Analysis: giving examples.Changing an organisation’s culture may be necessary as part of change management. What can a manager do to change an organisation’s culture?

Detailed rubric for the Group Research paper written report

	Excellent	Very good	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
	81-100%	71-80%	61-70%	50-60%	0-49.99%
Executive Summary (4 marks)	Clear evidence of a summary which summaries the entire report	Clear evidence of a summary which summarises the entire report	Some evidence of a summary which summarises the entire report	Limited evidence of a summary of the entire report	No executive summary included
Discussion on allocated general framework (8 marks)	Demonstration of outstanding knowledge of the chosen topic and has included significant research which are beyond areas covered within the lecture	Demonstration of very good knowledge of the chosen topic and has included some research beyond areas covered within the lecture notes.	Demonstration of good knowledge of the chosen topic and has included minimal research beyond areas covered within the lecture notes.	Demonstration of satisfactory knowledge of the chosen topic and has included no research beyond areas covered within the lecture notes.	Demonstration of little or no knowledge of the chosen topic and discussion has little or no relevance to the topic chosen.
Application of theory on Individual component discussion (8 marks)	Your		Your
	interpretation of		interpretation of
	theory is accurate	Your interpretation	theory is	Your
	and insightful and has included significant research which goes beyond areas covered within the lecture	of theory is accurate and has some insight and included some research which goes beyond areas covered within the	somewhat accurate and has included minimal research which is beyond areas covered within the lecture	interpretation of theory is very general and has included no research which is beyond areas covered within	Your interpretation of theory is missing or not relevant to the
	notes.	lecture notes.	notes.	the lecture notes.	topic. No
	Identification of	Identification of the	Identification of	Identification of	identification of
	the author has	author has been	the author has	the author has	the author had
	been identified.	identified.	been identified.	been identified.	been given
Overall presentation and quality of report (6 marks)	Report is exceptionally structured with clarity, use of paragraphs and subheadings.				Poorly
		Report is well structured with clarity, use of paragraphs and	Report is somewhat structured with clarity, use of paragraphs and	Report is structured with some clarity, and use of some paragraphs and	presented. Report is not structured with any clarity, and does not use of paragraphs and
		subheadings.	subheadings.	subheadings.	subheadings.

Referencing (4 marks)

Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least 6 peer- reviewed references were used from good sources. All in text referencing done correctly and relevant.

Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least 5 peer-reviewed references were used from good sources. All in text referencing done correctly and relevant

Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least 4 peer- reviewed references were used from good sources. Most in text referencing done correctly and relevant.

Limited attempt at formatting references. References largely unrelated to the topic area. At least 3 peer- reviewed references were provided. Most in text referencing done correctly and relevant.

Poorly presented, no apparent structure. No use of Harvard referencing style. References were unrelated to the topic area. Only 0 r 1 relevant reference given

Academic Integrity

Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on Blackboard.

Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.

Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breaches

Plagiarism	Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self-plagiarism.
Collusion	Working with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, in a way that is not authorised.
Copying	Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied, this may also be considered an offence.
Impersonation	Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself, in an in-person examination.
Contract cheating	Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment.
Data fabrication and falsification	Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false conclusions, including manipulating images.

Source: INQAAHE, 2020

Holmes Adapted Harvard Referencing Rules

Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:

1. Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources that provide full-text access to the source’s content

for lecturers and markers.

• The reference list must be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled: “References”.

• The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z alphabetically by author surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source. For example:

• All assignments must include in-text citations to the listed references. These must include the surname of the author/s or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page number of the content, and paragraph where the content can be found. For example, “The company decided to implement an enterprise-wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies (Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4)).”

Non-Adherence to Referencing Rules

Where students do not follow the above rules:

1. For students who submit HI6005 Management in a Global Environment assignments that do not comply with the rules, a 10% penalty will be applied.
2. As per the Student Handbook, late penalties will apply each day after the student/s has been notified of the due date.
3. Students who comply with rules and the citations are “fake” will be reported for academic misconduct.

Visit:https://auspali.info/

Also visit:https://www.notesnepal.com/archives/767

For solution: +610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

For solution:

WhatsApp

+610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

[email protected]