LGH602BM Leadership For Global Hospitality :

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title	LGH602BM Leadership for Global Hospitality
Assessment	Leadership Profile
Individual/Group	Individual
Length	1,750 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes	The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Identify and reflect on effective leadership outcomes within the current hotel industry.Identify and appraise core theories in contemporary literature, used to explain relevant behaviours for leadership in different contexts and for different stakeholders.Investigate and critically reflect on the emerging contemporary drivers in effective leadership.
Submission	Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 4.
Weighting	30%
Total Marks	100 marks

Assessment Task

Critically evaluate the application of core leadership theories demonstrated by an industry-based leader, through developing a profile of their responses, actions and behaviours to a chosen leadership area of discussion.

Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context

Leadership is an important component of professional life – both the leadership of others and oneself. The development of your leadership knowledge will assist your career progression, in particular managing teams in hospitality. A vital component of that development is an understanding of how leadership is currently being implemented in industry today.

This assessment will evaluate your ability to identify and reflect on effective leadership outcomes using the core leadership theories presented in this subject.

Task Instructions

You will be presented with several different areas of discussion currently topical in the global hospitality industry. Examples of these areas of discussion may include sustainability, ethics, diversity and inclusion, and employee relations. The areas of discussion for this assessment will be provided to students in the first week of the subject.

1. You will need to select and critically review one area only.
2. After selecting your area of discussion, you will then need to choose a hotel brand that has been or is currently focusing on that particular area. You are then to develop a profile on the leadership demonstrated by the hotel brand by considering a series of questions provided below, critically evaluating the effectiveness of the leadership demonstrated using the knowledge you have gained up to and including Week 4.

Your Leadership Profile should consider the following points, using this suggested format:

Torrens Assessment Cover Sheet Table of Contents

Introduction – Outline what the topic of the report is and then briefly discuss what the reader will learn from reading the report. This section does not usually include any referencing.

1.       Context for the Leadership Profile

1. Explain the area of discussion you have chosen – why is this an important area for global hospitality?
   1. Identify and briefly overview the hotel brand that you have chosen for this profile.
   1. Why are they a leader in this area — what specific initiatives/programs have been developed and implemented in relation to the area of discussion?
   1. How were these initiatives shared and communicated with employees and within the broader community?
   1. How have they been publicly recognised in relation to this area of discussion? For example, have they won awards, peer praise, industry recognition, etc.?

2.       The Leadership Profile

• Outline the four (4) most significant leadership characteristics, behaviours, and attitudes that have been used/applied throughout the implementation of these initiatives?
  • Outline any evidence that would indicate whether the hotel brand adopted a particular style of leadership throughout the implementation of these initiatives. Base this section on the topics covered up to and including Week 4.

3.       Critical Evaluation

• Using the core theories of leadership discussed in the curriculum as a framework, undertake a critical evaluation of the leadership behaviours, attitudes, actions and styles used to determine whether the leadership can be considered effective.
  • Make two (2) recommendations on ways in which the hotel brand could have improved their leadership during this period and/or in the future.

Conclusion — Summarise the key points that you made in the body of your report, including the main theory applied. Do not include new information or any references in a Conclusion. It is simply a summary of previous information.

Reference list — Minimum of six academic and/or industry-related sources with separate listing for visuals/images.

Other considerations

• Write in the context of the global hospitality industry.

• Make sure that you understand the assessment requirements and task set — include only relevant and necessary content. If you do not understand any aspect of the assessment task, ask your Learning Facilitator.
• The submission will be assessed according to the quality and depth of thought, relevance and how effectively you have applied the subject material and theories to the Leadership Profile. Refer to the marking criteria — the Assessment Rubric and the end of this document — before submitting and conduct a self-evaluation.
• Stay within the maximum word count of 1,750 words +/- 10% (excluding the Table of Contents, Reference List and Appendices). Please see more information on penalties associated with breaching the word count. Please consult Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS – Assessment procedure.
• The format is a business report – and this forms part of your grading. Therefore, students are discouraged from writing using an essay format (for example: lengthy verbose sentences displayed in long chunky paragraphs). Rather, students are to make use of the recommended table of contents as well as visuals/images, additional sub-headings, displaying information in tables, bullet points — aspects that will improve the readability and reduce the wordiness of the submission. Students will be penalised for submitting an essay format. Please see more information on business report formats in the Academic Skills webpage.

Referencing

A variety of credible references, such as peer-reviewed journals and publications from reputable publishers, or recognised quality business-sourced references should be used to support analyses and arguments. Instead of simply quoting or paraphrasing from a source, students should interpret and/or evaluate the idea in question.

Blogs, unauthorised biographies, promotional material, and sensational content must be excluded from the Leadership Profile.

For this assessment, a minimum of six (6) academic or recognised industry-based references are required.

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.

Submission Instructions

Submit this task as a Word document via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in LGH602BM Assessment 1 Leadership Profile. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Academic Integrity

All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.

Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

Special Consideration

To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS, and if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.

Assessment Rubric

Assessment Attributes	Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%	Pass (Functional) 50-64%	Credit (Proficient) 65-74%	Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%	High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Communication and presentation       Percentage for this criterion = 15%	Communication is unstructured and unfocused, both in the written word and document layout.   Does not adhere to the Academic Writing Guide and/or Brief guidelines.	Some communication is effective. Acceptable standard of academic writing with some errors in writing and layout of document. Some adherences to the Academic Writing Guide and/or Brief guidelines but omissions evident.	Can communicate effectively with a good standard of academic writing and well- crafted document layout. Adherence to the Academic Writing Guide and/or Brief guidelines.	Can communicate in a superior manner. High standard of academic writing, no errors evident. High standard in document layout. Adherence to the Academic Writing Guide and/or Brief guidelines.	Communication is of a high quality, presented in an engaging and effective manner. Extremely well-crafted document layout. Adherence to the Academic Writing Guide and/or Brief guidelines.
Knowledge and understanding of Leadership core theories     Percentage for this criterion = 20%	Limited understanding demonstrated of the required core leadership theories, concepts, and knowledge. Consistently confuses assertion of opinion with information not substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.	Knowledge or understanding of the core leadership theories, concepts, and knowledge as shown through analysis may resemble a recall or summary of key ideas. Confuses assertion of opinion with information not substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.	Thorough knowledge or understanding of the core leadership theories, concepts, and knowledge as shown through analysis. Supports opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates an adequate capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.	Highly developed understanding of the core leadership theories, concepts, and knowledge as shown through analysis. Discriminates between opinion and information substantiated by relevant evidence. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.	A sophisticated understanding of the core leadership theories, concepts, and knowledge as shown through analysis. Systematically and critically discriminates between the assertion of opinion and information substantiated by robust and relevant evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Attention to purpose     Percentage for this criterion = 20%	Fails to address the task set. Key components of the assessment are not addressed. The level of accuracy and detail is of poor quality.	The key components of the assessment have been addressed coherently but some inaccuracies evident. The level of accuracy and detail is satisfactory but omissions evident.	Has addressed the purpose and the key components of the assessment with a degree of cohesiveness and accuracy. Only minor omissions on vital detail evident	Has addressed the purpose and the key components of the assessment coherently with a high degree of accuracy and detail evident. Some evidence of creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge being applied	Has addressed the purpose and the key components of the assessment comprehensively with a very high level of accuracy and detail. A sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge being applied
Critical thinking and critical evaluation Percentage for this criterion = 25%	Does not exercise critical thinking skills and/or does not apply critical evaluation methods.	Aware of some critical thinking/critical evaluation techniques, and uses them with limited success.	A limited range of critical thinking/critical evaluation techniques applied with some success.	A clear range of critical thinking/critical evaluation techniques applied with a good degree of success.	A clear range of critical thinking/critical evaluation techniques applied with a high degree success.

Assessment Attributes	Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%	Pass (Functional) 50-64%	Credit (Proficient) 65-74%	Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%	High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Correct citation of key resources and evidence         Percentage for this criterion = 20%	Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. No direct links to course material. Does not meet minimum requirement of six (6) academic or recognised industry references. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA.	Meets minimum requirement of six (6) academic or recognised industry references. Demonstrates limited use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. These are not always explicit or well developed and have limited direct links to course material. Referencing resembles APA, with frequent or repeated errors.	Exceeds minimum requirement of six (6) academic or recognised industry references. Demonstrates use of independent, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Documented links to course material evident. Referencing resembles APA, with occasional errors.	Exceeds minimum requirement of six (6) academic or recognised industry references. Demonstrates use of independent good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors.	Exceeds minimum requirements of six (6) academic or recognised industry references. Demonstrates use of high- quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors.

Visit:https://auspali.info/

Also visit:https://www.notesnepal.com/archives/767

For solution:

WhatsApp

+610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

[email protected]