HOST204 Food And Beverage Management

HOST204 Food And Beverage Management :

Subject Code and Title HOST204-Food and Beverage Management Lecturer / Tutor Ms Fifita Evans(Sydney) Email: [email protected] Mr. Jeremias Muanna (Darwin) Email: [email protected] Assessment Title AT2 Written Report (40%) Course Learning Outcomes Learning Outcomes 3 and 4 Examine the efficiency and effectiveness of stock control systems employed by food and beverage enterprisesAnalyse and modify standardised staffing and product quality control measures and apply to a localised context Description For this assessment, you are required to prepare a business report based on the audit of food and beverage enterprise control systems within a selected hospitality organisation or a related case study.   Release date   The selected hospitality organisations will be uploaded to the Course Hub (under the Assessment tasks tile) on Monday of Week 6 and you will be notified by way of an announcement issued via the Course Hub Due date 11.55pm Friday, Week 9 Word limit 1500 to 2000. Other requirements Use 12 pt font Double-space your document to allow room for feedback State your name and student number in the document header State the word count in the document header Include a bibliography Comply with the APA referencing style Submission type PDF file (.pdf) or Word (.doc) file only

u.au

Selected hospitality organisations and further assessment instructions

Context

Select an existing local food and beverage enterprise (see enterprise list below).

Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of stock control systems employed by your chosen food and beverage enterprise. You are also required to analyse the enterprises standarised staffing and product quality control.

You are also free to choose your own enterprise (outside of the list below). Before you commence your research get the approval from your lecturer that the enterprise you selected is appropriate for this report.

Enterprise list:

1. Nandos
2. Crinitis
3. Rockpool Dining
4. Nobu restaurant
5. Fratelli
6. ChatThai
7. McDonalds

As part of your analysis, consider the target markets, concepts, menu design, staffing, pricing, and location. After your analysis, include your recommendations outlined below in the suggested structure.

You must include the following in the structure of your submission:

• Introduction (about 10% of the word count)
  • Body
    • Enterprise background
      • Location
      • Target market
      • Menu Design / Product Quality / Price
      • Staffing
    • Examine the efficiency and effectiveness of the enterprises stock control systems
    • Analyse the enterprises standarised staffing and product quality control
  • Recommendations

Present at least four (4) recommendations based on the main findings of your research:

This should focus on how the enterprise can improve efficiency and effectiveness of their stock

control systems.

You will also need to include suggestions on how to modify their standardised staffing and product quality control measures and where they can be implemented.

• Reference list
  • Appendices

Rubric for AT2 Written Report

	Fail	Pass	Credit	Distinction	High Distinction
Depth and credibility of research	You have not demonstrated that you have conducted enough research (eg insufficient references to credible research or peer-reviewed academic literature), and/or you have relied on doubtful sources	You have demonstrated that you have conducted enough research (eg based on the number of references to credible research and/or peer-reviewed academic literature), and you have relied on credible sources	The depth and credibility of your research is above average (based on the number and quality of your sources)	The depth and credibility of your research is very good (based on the number and quality of your sources)	The depth and credibility of your research is exceptional (based on the number and quality of your sources)
Description of the issue/problem in terms of theories and concepts studied in this course	Your description of the issue/problem is inaccurate and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding of the theories and concepts studied (eg because of incorrect use of terminology)	Your description is accurate and demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the theories and concepts studied	Your description is accurate and demonstrates an above average understanding of the theories and concepts studied	Your description is accurate and demonstrates a very good understanding of the theories and concepts studied	Your description is accurate and demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the theories and concepts studied
Coherence of analysis	Your analysis is illogical and/or poorly reasoned (eg because it relies on unfounded assumptions or misunderstands the theories and concepts applied)	Your analysis is mostly logical and well-reasoned	Your analysis is logical and well- reasoned to an above average standard	Your analysis is logical and well- reasoned to a very good standard	Your analysis is logical and well- reasoned to an exceptional standard
Support for findings and analysis	Your findings or analysis are insufficiently supported by theory and/or evidence	Your findings and analysis are supported by theory and/or evidence	Your findings and analysis are supported by theory and/or evidence to an above average standard	Your findings and analysis are supported by theory and/or evidence to a very good standard	Your findings and analysis are supported by theory and/or evidence to an exceptional standard
Creativity	Your report lacks creativity	Your report is appropriately creative, whether in substance or format	Your report is appropriately creative to an above average standard	Your report is appropriately creative to a very good standard	Your report is appropriately creative to an exceptional standard
Use of a commercially appropriate document structure (eg ‘executive summary,’ ‘circumstances,’ ‘findings and analysis,’	Your document is not structured in a commercially appropriate manner (eg lacking relevant headings)	Your document is well structured a commercially appropriate manner (eg using relevant headings)	Your document is well structured a commercially appropriate manner to an above average standard	Your document is well structured a commercially appropriate manner to a very high standard	Your document is well structured a commercially appropriate manner to an exceptional standard

‘conclusion/recommendations’)
Use of academically appropriate document style, writing style and referencing system	You have not used an academically appropriate writing style and/or referencing system (eg you have used colloquialisms or overly formal language or failed to use a recognised referencing system eg APA or Harvard)	You have used an academically appropriate writing style and referencing system	You have used an academically appropriate writing style and referencing system to an above average standard	You have used an academically appropriate writing style and referencing system to a very high standard	You have used an academically appropriate writing style and referencing system to an exceptionally high standard
Effectiveness of communication	Your written communication is poor	Your written communication is easy to follow	Your written communication is clear and succinct to an above average standard	Your written communication is clear and succinct to a very high standard	Your written communication is clear and succinct to an exceptionally high standard

For solution:

WhatsApp

+610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

[email protected]