ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION :

For solution: +610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*

Success in Higher Education

ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION T322

All information in the Subject Outline is correct at the time of approval. KOI reserves the right to make changes to the Subject Outline if they become necessary. Any changes require the approval of the KOI Academic Board and will be formally advised to those students who may be affected by email and via Moodle.

Information contained within this Subject Outline applies to students enrolled in the trimester as indicated

1.       General Information

1.1   Administrative Details

Associated HE Award(s)	Duration	Level	Subject Coordinator
Bachelor of Information Technology (BIT)	1 trimester	Level 2	Dr Sanjay Jha [email protected] P: +61 (2) 9283 3583 L: Level 1-2, 17 O’Connell St. Consultation: via Moodle or by appointment.

1. Core / Elective

Core subject for BIT

1.3 Subject Weighting

Indicated below is the weighting of this subject and the total course points.

Subject Credit Points	Total Course Credit Points
4	BIT (96 Credit Points)

1.4   Student Workload

Indicated below is the expected student workload per week for this subject

No. Timetabled Hours/Week*	No. Personal Study Hours/Week**	Total Workload Hours/Week***
4 hours/week (2 hour Lecture + 2 hour Tutorial)	6 hours/week	10 hours/week

*    Total time spent per week at lectures and tutorials

**   Total time students are expected to spend per week in studying, completing assignments, etc.

***  Combination of timetable hours and personal study.

1. Mode of Delivery Face-to-face unless otherwise notified (please check Moodle). Note – in T322, KOI is in transition and most classes will be returning to face-to-face delivery. However, there are a range of issues remaining because of COVID-19. For example, some students may have trouble travelling to Australia. Because of this some classes may still be online. This affects whether the final exam for a subject will be open-book or closed-book. After enrolment KOI will be able to make a determination and notification will be

provided on Moodle before Week 7.

1.6   Pre-requisites      Nil

1. General Study and Resource Requirements
2. Dedicated computer laboratories are available for student use. Normally, tutorial classes are conducted in the computer laboratories.
3. Students are expected to attend classes with the requisite textbook and must read specific chapters prior to each tutorial. This will allow them to actively take part in discussions. Students should have elementary skills in both word processing and electronic spreadsheet software, such as Office 365 or MS Word and MS Excel.
4. Computers and WIFI facilities are extensively available for student use throughout KOI. Students are encouraged to make use of the campus Library for reference materials.
5. Students will require access to the internet and email. Where students use their own computers, they should have internet access. KOI will provide access to required software.

Resource requirements specific to this subject: MS Imagine, MS Azure, HTML, CSS, RJ TextEd, NetBeans IDE 8.1, Sublime Text, Notepad++.

2    Academic Details

2.1   Overview of the Subject

Human Computer Interaction (HCI) is the study of the design, implementation and evaluation of computer- based applications, focusing particularly on the interfaces between people (users) and computers. In this subject, students learn about the novel ways in which humans interact with computers and design interfaces. This includes the designing of easy-to-use Web-based applications and development phases, both physical and psychological, usability testing, accessibility and analytics. Students will learn to use web-authoring tools to turn design of computer-based applications into working examples. These tools include HTML5 and CSS3.

• Graduate Attributes for Undergraduate Courses

Graduates of Bachelor courses from King’s Own Institute (KOI) will achieve the graduate attributes expected under the Australian Qualifications Framework (2^nd edition, January 2013). Graduates at this level will be able to apply a broad and coherent body of knowledge from their major area of study in a range of contexts for professional practice or scholarship and as a pathway for further learning.

King’s Own Institute’s generic graduate attributes for a bachelor’s level degree are summarised below:

	KOI Bachelor Degree Graduate Attributes	Detailed Description
	Knowledge	Current, comprehensive, and coherent and connected knowledge
	Critical Thinking	Critical thinking and creative skills to analyse and synthesise information and evaluate new problems
	Communication	Communication skills for effective reading, writing, listening and presenting in varied modes and contexts and for transferring knowledge and skills to a variety of audiences
	Information Literacy	Information and technological skills for accessing, evaluating, managing and using information professionally
	Problem Solving Skills	Skills to apply logical and creative thinking to solve problems and evaluate solutions
	Ethical and Cultural	Appreciation of ethical principles, cultural sensitivity and social responsibility, both personally and professionally

	Sensitivity
	Teamwork	Leadership and teamwork skills to collaborate, inspire colleagues and manage responsibly with positive results
	Professional Skills	Professional skills to exercise judgement in planning, problem solving and decision making

Across the course, these skills are developed progressively at three levels:

• Level 1 Foundation – Students learn the basic skills, theories and techniques of the subject and apply them in basic, standalone contexts
• Level 2 Intermediate – Students further develop the skills, theories and techniques of the subject and apply them in more complex contexts, and begin to integrate this application with other subjects.
• Level 3 Advanced – Students demonstrate an ability to plan, research and apply the skills, theories and techniques of the subject in complex situations, integrating the subject content with a range of other subject disciplines within the context of the course.

2.3   Subject Learning Outcomes

This is a Level 2 subject.

On successful completion of this subject, students should be able to:

Subject Learning Outcomes	Contribution to Graduate Attributes
a) Apply the theory and frameworks of human-computer interaction
b) Evaluate the design and functionality of an interactive web- based computer interface.
c) Design and implement an interactive web-based application using HTML and CSS3
d) Analyse the issues involved in human-computer interaction, including user differences, user experience and collaboration

2.4   Subject Content and Structure

Below are details of the subject content and how it is structured, including specific topics covered in lectures and tutorials. Reading refers to the text unless otherwise indicated.

Weekly Planner:

Week (beginning)	Topic covered in each week’s lecture	Reading(s)	Expected work as listed in Moodle
1 31 Oct	Usability of interactive systems, guidelines principles and theories	Chs.1, 3	Discuss review questions in the tutorial. Formative not graded.

2 07 Nov	Universal Usability Design Case Studies	Chs.2,6	Discuss review questions in the tutorial. Formative not graded Reflective Journal, Summative assessment 2%
3 14 Nov	The Timely user experience Design Case Studies	Chs.6, 13	Discuss review questions in the tutorial. Formative not graded
4 21 Nov	Direct manipulations and Immersive environments	Ch.7	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML. Formative not graded. Reflective Journal, Summative assessment 2% Assignment 4 (part 1) due: Summative assessment worth 10%
5 28 Nov	Fluid Navigation	Ch.8	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML. Formative not graded. Assignment 2 due Summative worth 20%
6 05 Dec	Command and natural languages Mid-Term Exam	Ch.9	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML. Formative not graded. Reflective Journal, Summative assessment 2% Mid-Term Exam (20%)
7 12 Dec	Interaction devices	Ch. 10	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML/CSS. Formative not graded
8 03 Jan (Tue)	Communication and collaboration	Ch.11	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML/CSS. Formative not graded. Reflective Journal, Summative assessment 2%
9 09 Jan	Evaluation and the user experience	Ch.5	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML /CSS. Formative not graded. Deferred mid trimester exams – see Section 2.6 below for more

			information
10 16 Jan	Design	Ch.4	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML/CSS Formative not graded. Reflective Journal, Summative assessment 2% Assignment 4: due Summative worth 25%
11 23 Jan	Advancing the user experience Documentation and user support	Chs. 12, 14	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML/CSS. Formative not graded. Assignment 4: due Summative 15%
12 30 Jan	Information search Data visualization	Chs.15, 16	Discuss review questions in the tutorial, work on HTML/CSS. Formative not graded. Assignment 4: due Summative 15%
13 06 Feb	Study review week and Final Exam Week
14 13 Feb	Examinations Continuing students – enrolments for T123 open		Please see exam timetable for exam date, time and location
15 20 Feb	Student Vacation begins New students – enrolments for T123 open
16 27 Feb	Results ReleasedReview of Grade Day for T322 – see Sections 2.6 and 3.2 below for relevant information.Certification of Grades NOTE: More information about the dates will be provided at a later date through Moodle/KOI email.
T123 6 Mar 2023
1 06 Mar	Week 1 of classes for T123

2.5   Public Holiday Amendments

Please note: KOI is closed on all scheduled NSW Public Holidays.

T322 has two (2) public holidays that occur during this trimester. Classes scheduled for these public holidays (Calendar Class Dates) will be rescheduled as per the table below.

This applies to ALL subjects taught in T322.

Please see the table below and adjust your class timing as required. Please make sure you have arrangements in place to attend the rescheduled classes if applicable to your T322 enrolment.

Classes will be conducted at the same time and in the same location as your normally scheduled class except these classes will be held on the date shown below.

Calendar Class Date	Rescheduled Class Date
Monday 02 January 2023 (Week 8) Thursday 26 January 2023 (Week 11)	Monday 06 Feb 2023 Tuesday 07 Feb 2023

2.6   Review of Grade, Deferred Exams & Supplementary Exams/Assessments

Review of Grade:

There may be instances when you believe that your final grade in a subject does not accurately reflect your performance against the marking criteria. Section 8 of the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy (www.koi.edu.au) describes the grounds on which you may apply for a Review of Grade.

If you have a concern about your marks and you are unable to resolve it with the Academic staff concerned, then you can apply for a formal Review of Grade as explained in section 3.2(e) Appeals Process below. Please note the time limits for requesting a review. Please ensure you read the Review of Grade information before submitting an application.

Review of Grade Day:

Final exam scripts will not normally be returned to students. Students can obtain feedback on their exam performance and their results for the whole subject at the Review of Grade Day. KOI will hold the Review of Grade Day for all subjects studied in T322. The ROG Day will be in week 16, the date will be announced at a later date and the students will be notified through Moodle/KOI email.

Only final exams and whole subject results will be discussed as all other assessments should have been reviewed during the trimester. Further information about Review of Grade Day will be available through Moodle.

If you fail one or more subjects and you wish to consider applying for a Review of Grade you are STRONGLY ADVISED to attend the Review of Grade Day. You will have the chance to discuss your final exam and subject result with your lecturer, and will be advised if you have valid reasons for applying for a Review of Grade (see Section 3.2 below and the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy).

A formal request for a review of grade may not be considered unless you first contact the subject coordinator to discuss the result.

Deferred Exams:

If you wish to apply for a deferred exam because you are unable to attend the scheduled exam, you should submit the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form available by contacting [email protected] as soon as possible, but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date.

If you miss your mid-trimester or final exam there is no guarantee you will be offered a deferred exam. You must apply within the stated timeframe and satisfy the conditions for approval to be offered a deferred

exam (see Section 8.1 of the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy and the Application for Assignment Extension or Deferred Exam Forms). In assessing your request for a deferred exam, KOI will take into account the information you provide, the severity of the event or circumstance, your performance on other items of ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment in the subject, class attendance and your history of previous applications for special consideration.

Deferred mid-trimester exams will be held before the end of week 9. Deferred final exams will be held on two days during week 1 or 2 in the next trimester. You will not normally be granted a deferred exam on the grounds that you mistook the time, date or place of an examination, or that you have made arrangements to be elsewhere at that time; for example, have booked plane tickets.

If you are offered a deferred exam, but do not attend you will be awarded 0 marks for the exam. This may mean it becomes difficult for you to pass the subject. If you apply for a deferred exam within the required time frame and satisfy the conditions you will be advised by email (to your KOI student email address) of the time and date for the deferred exam. Please ensure that you are available to take the exam at this time.

Marks awarded for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that item of assessment towards your final mark in the subject.

Supplementary Assessments (Exams and Assessments):

A supplementaryICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment may be offered to students to provide a final opportunity to demonstrate successful achievement of the learning outcomes of a subject. Supplementary assessments are only offered at the discretion of the Board of Examiners. In considering whether or not to offer a supplementary assessment, KOI will take into account your performance on all the major assessment items in the subject, your attendance, participation and your history of any previous special considerations.

If you are offered a supplementary ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment, you will be advised by email to your KOI student email address of the time and due date for the supplementary assessment – supplementary exams will normally be held at the same time as deferred final exams during week 1 or week 2 of the next trimester.

You must pass the supplementary assessment to pass the subject. The maximum grade you can achieve in a subject based on a supplementary assessment is a PASS grade.

If you:

• are offered a supplementary assessment, but fail it;
• are offered a supplementary exam, but do not attend; or
• are offered a supplementary assessment but do not submit by the due date; you will receive a FAIL grade for the subject.

Students are also eligible for a supplementary assessment for their final subject in a course where they fail the subject but have successfully completed all other subjects in the course. You must have completed all major assessment tasks for the subject and obtained a passing mark on at least one of the major assessment tasks to be eligible for a supplementary assessment.

If you believe you meet the criteria for a supplementary assessment for the final subject in your course, but have not received an offer, complete the Complaint, Grievance, Appeal Form and send your form to [email protected]. The deadline for applying for supplementary assessment is the Friday of the first week of classes in the next trimester.

2.7   Teaching Methods/Strategies

Briefly described below are the teaching methods/strategies used in this subject:

2.8  
Student Assessment

Provided below is a schedule of formal assessment tasks and major examinations for the subject.

Assessment Type	When assessed	Weighting	Learning Outcomes Assessed
Assessment 1: Reflective journal (500 words)	Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 8 Week 10	2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Total: 10%	a, b, c, d
Assessment 2: Critical analysis of a nominated website	Week 5	20%	a, b
Assessment 3: Mid- trimester test	Week 6	20%	a, b
Assessment 4: Website prototype design Group report 2,500 words Group presentation 15 minutes	Project plan: week 4 Group report: week 10 Group presentations: weeks 11-12	10% 25% 15% Total: 50%	c, d

Requirements to Pass the Subject:

To gain a pass or better in this subject, students must gain a minimum of 50% of the total available subject marks.

2.9   Prescribed and Recommended Readings

Provided below, in formal reference format, is a list of the prescribed and recommended readings.

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=140253237&site=ehost-live.

Lycett, M. and Radwan, O., 2019. ‘Developing a Quality of Experience (QoE) model for Web Applications’, Information Systems Journal, 29(1), pp. 175–199. Viewed 20 February 2020, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=133481582&site=ehost-live.

Pedro R. Palos-Sanchez, Jose Ramon Saura, Felipe Debasa “The Influence of Social Networks on the Development of Recruitment Actions that Favor User Interface Design and Conversions in Mobile Applications” Powered by Linked Data

Volume 2018 |Article ID 5047017 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5047017

References available from EBSCOhost research databases:

• ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
• Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
• Information Systems Journal
• Journal of Information Systems Education
• Web Intelligence

Recommended web resources:

AISWorld Net – Association for Information Systems. An entry point to resources related to information systems technology for information systems academics and practitioners. https://aisnet.org/

IntechOpen – IntechOpen the world’s leading publisher of Peer Review Quality Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists.

https://www.intechopen.com/books/subject/human-computer-interaction

Conference/ Journal Articles:

Students are encouraged to read peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers. Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. From one place, you can search across many disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions, from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, universities and other web sites.

3.       Assessment Details

3.1   Details of Each Assessment Item

The assessments for this subject are described below. Other assessment information and/or assistance can be found in Moodle. Marking guides for ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessments follow the assessment descriptions. Students should compare final drafts of their assessment against the marking guide before submission.

KOI expects students to submit their own original work in both assignments and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of group assignments.

Assessment 1

Assessment type: Individual reflective journal (500 words)

Purpose: A reflective journal is a personal record of a student’s learning experiences. It is a space where a learner can record and reflect upon their observations and responses to situations, which can then be used to explore and analyse ways of thinking. The purpose of the assessment is to test your understanding of Human Computer Interface Design and its principles applied in the development of a prototype design. The aim of a reflective log is to give you an opportunity to keep a record of the work you undertake, note any existing skills you develop, and learn to identify areas in which you would like to improve. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a, b, c and d.

Value: 10%           Due Date: Biweekly submission

Submission requirements details: Week 2 (2%) + Week 4 (2%) + Week 6 (2%) + Week 8 (2%) + Week 10

(2%) = Total (10%)

Assessment topic: Reflective journal on two week in class activities

Task Details: The template for writing biweekly reflective journals will be provided on Moodle. Students will be expected to prepare the reflective journal accordingly.

Marking Rubric for Assessment 1 (biweekly)

Criteria	Fail (0 – 49%)	Pass (50 – 64%)	Credit (65 – 74%)	Distinction (75 – 84%)	High Distinction (85 – 100%)
Content Reflection 0.5 Marks	Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and course materials, activities, and/or assignments	Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analysing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.	Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analysing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.	Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analysing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.	Exceptional reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analysing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

Personal growth 1 Marks	Conveys inadequate evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self- assessment questions posed. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates a neutral experience with negligible personal impact. Lacks sufficient inferences, examples, personal insights and challenges, and/or future implications are overlooked.	Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self- assessment questions posed. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience.	Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self- assessment questions posed. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. Some thought of the future implications of current experience.	Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self- assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.	Exceptionally conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self- assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.
Writing Quality 0.5 Marks	Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.	Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.	Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.	Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterised by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.	Exceptionally well written and clearly organised using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.

Assessment 2:

Assessment type: Individual written assessment (1,000 words)

Purpose: ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assessment 1 is a report critically analysing a nominated website. Students must identify all the good interface design principles used in the website design. The report should point out the good and bad practices of interface design. This ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment contributes to learning outcomes a and b.

Value: 20%           Due Date: Week 5 ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assessment topic: Analysis of nominated website

Task Details: Write an analysis report on one of the following type of websites:

• Business website.
  • Personal website.
  • Membership website.
  • Event website.
  • Blog website.
  • News Website

The report should include the following points:

1. Introduction: The introduction about your selected website. All the relevant information and background details should include.
2. Website Structure: The structure of your chosen website should be covered properly. The report should include how the website is set up, the individual subpages are linked to one another etc.
3. Interface Design: Identify at least 5-6 good and bad interface design principles used in the website design. Justify the good and bad interface design identified by you.
4. Screenshots: Provide screenshot samples for all the good and bad interface design principles you have identified in the website and support those with discussion.
5. Conclusion and Recommendations: After the analysis provide a comprehensive summary of the report. Also, add the limitations you have studied and what will be the future scope to overcome those limitations.

Assessment 2 Marking Rubric:

Criteria	Unsatisfactory	Satisfactory	Effective	Excellent	Exceptional
Answer the given questions	Fail (0 – 49%)	Pass (50 – 64%)	Credit (65 – 74%)	Distinction (75 – 84%)	High Distinction (85 – 100%)
Introduction   3 Marks	No introduction given or most of the introduction is irrelevant	Introduction of the business case is provided with some details and limited cohesion	Introduction of the business case is provided with most of the required details in a cohesive manner	Introduction of the business case is provided with all of the required details in a comprehensive and cohesive manner	Introduction of the business case is provided with all details presented systematically in a comprehensive and cohesive manner
Website Structure 3 Marks	Very difficult to read, unclear structure, and most of the required sections are missing	Some difficulty in reading, not very clear, but important sections are included	Clear and readable, and all required sections are included	Well written and very clear, and all required sections with completed discussion are included	Well written and very clear, all required sections with completed discussion are included, and additional sections have been added for clarity
Interface Design Principles 7 Marks	Not included or irrelevant discussion	3-4 design principles identified with limited discussion	4-5 design principles identified with some discussion	5-6 design principles identified with good discussion	5-6 design principles identified with excellent discussion and supported arguments
Screenshots 3 Marks	No screenshots provided or irrelevant screenshots given	3-4 relevant screenshots provided with limited discussion	4-5 screenshots provided with discussion	All screenshots provided with good discussion	All relevant screenshots provided with excellent discussion and supported arguments
Conclusion and Recommendation 4 Marks	No conclusion or lack of cohesion with the discussion, no or limited recommendations provided	Conclusion does not link back systematically to most sections, some basic recommendations provided	Conclusion links back to some sections of the report, some detailed recommendations provided	Conclusion links back to all sections of the report, detailed recommendations provided	Conclusion demonstrates a deep understanding of the proposed solution and relates back to all sections of the report, detailed recommendations provided

Assessment 3

Assessment type: Individual assessment- Mid-trimester test (1 hour)

Assessment purpose: Covers topics of Weeks 1 to 5. This ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment contributes to learning outcomes a and b.

Value: 20%           Due Date: Week 6 Assessment topic: Mid-trimester test

Task details: The assessment will consist of a series of short answer questions relating to subject content from topics covered in weeks 1 to 5 inclusive.

Submission requirements details: In class test Marking Rubric:

	Unsatisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	Very good	Exceptional
Grade	Fail	Pass	Credit	Distinction	High distinction
Marks	0-49%	50-64%	65-74%	75-84%	>84%

Assessment 4

Assessment type: Group assessment

Purpose: This assessment will allow students to develop a website. This ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment contributes to learning outcomes c and d.

Value: 50% (Project plan 10%; Group report 25%; Group presentation 15%)

Due Date: Week 4 (Project plan); Week 10 (Group report); Weeks 11-12 (Group presentations)

Assessment topic: Group Project (3-5 members in a group): project plan (500 words – will be discussed in class), report with working prototype (2,500 words) and presentation (15 minutes).

Task Details: This assessment requires students to design a website of their choice in their area of interest. Students are required to develop a prototype of the website. The prototype will be used to test the applicability of interface design. Students are allowed to design and develop the prototype in HTML and CSS only based on the skill acquired in the tutorials. A group report needs to be completed and students must present the outcome of their project.

Students will be expected to answer the questions during the presentation about their project.

The project plan must include:

1. Title and description of the website
2. Design Plan (preliminary sketches of the website)
3. Members role and responsibilities
4. Project Plan (Gantt Chart and other related information)

The Report must contain following sections:

1. Introduction of the report
2. Detailed design of the webpages and all interfaces
3. Prototype development with testing and screenshots
4. Conclusion and Recommendations
5. References

Presentation: The students will give 15 min presentation and demonstration of their project. Assessment 4 – Rubric Marking for Project Plan (10%), Due week 4

Criteria	Unsatisfactory	Satisfactory	Effective	Excellent	Exceptional
Answer the given questions	Fail           (0 – 49%)	Pass     (50 – 64%)	Credit          (65 – 74%)	Distinction (75 – 84%)	High Distinction (85 – 100%)
Title and description 4 Marks	Title is not clear and irrelevant to the project, no description of the project provided	Title is specific and relevant; the incomplete project description is provided	Title is specific and relevant; provided the complete project description	Title and project description are very well written	Title and project description are very well written and additional sections have been added for clarity
Design Plan 2 Marks	No specification in the form of a prototype or process; provided the inapplicable design plan	Some specification in the form of a prototype or process is provided in the design plan	Most of the specification in the form of a prototype or process is provided in the design plan	All the specification in the form of a prototype or process is provided in the design plan with some future scope and limitations	All the specification in the form of a prototype or process is provided in the design plan; also covered the future scope and limitations in terms of real-world applications
Members roles        and responsibility 2 Marks	Members roles and responsibility are not clear and specific	Members roles and responsibility are clear with some of the specific details	Members roles and responsibility are clear with most of the specific details	Members roles and responsibility are clear; the distribution of the project work is evenly distributed to support their efforts	Members roles and responsibility are very well written; the distribution of their project work is supported with enough evidence
Project plan 2 Marks	The control and execution of a project plan is not clear and convincing	The control and execution of a project plan is clear but the supporting contents which required from a project plan is not provided	The control and execution of a project plan is clear and some of the supporting contents which required from a project plan is also provided	The project plan is well – written with most of the required fields such as a resource list, work breakdown structure, a project schedule, a risk plan and the scope of work statement is provided	The project plan is very well – written with all the required fields such as a resource list, work breakdown structure, a project schedule, a risk plan and the scope of work statement is provided

Assessment 4 – Rubric Marking for Group Report (25%), Due week 10

Criteria	Fail (0 – 49%)	Pass (50 – 64%)	Credit (65 – 74%)	Distinction (75 – 84%)	High Distinction (85 – 100%)
Introduction 3 Marks	No introduction given or irrelevant details	Introduction section provided with some details	Introduction section provided with most of the required details in a coherence way,	Introduction section provided with all of the required details in a comprehensive and cohesive manner	Introduction section provided with all details presented systematically in a comprehensive and cohesive manner
Quality of Design 6 Marks	No design provided or irrelevant design aspects discussed	Some of the design details are given but not clear	Most design details are provided with limited explanation	Most design details are provided with relevant explanation	Exceptionally good design details are provided with all required explanation and supporting arguments
Prototype, development 8 Marks	Poor quality less than 50% HCI rules implemented. (8 golden rules)	50%-65% HCI rules implemented (8 golden rules)	65%-75% HCI rules implemented (8 golden rules)	Professional appearance prototype submitted. More than 75% HCI rules implemented (8 golden rules)	Exceptionally professional working prototype submitted, All HCI rules Implemented (8 golden rules)
Conclusion, recommendations, etc.   3 Marks	No conclusion or lack of cohesion with the discussion, no or limited	Conclusion does not link back systematically to most sections, some basic	Conclusion links back to some sections of the report, some detailed	Conclusion links back to all sections of the report, detailed recommendations provided	Conclusion demonstrates a deep understanding of the proposed solution and relates back to all

	recommendations provided	recommendations provided	recommendations provided		sections of the report, detailed recommendations provided
Format and References 2.5 Marks	Students did not follow the required format in the report or in referencing	Report includes most of the report sections but not all, referencing incorrect on several occasions	Report includes most of the report format sections but missed at least one section, referencing generally in correct format	Report has used the requested format in an acceptable structure, referencing always in correct format	Report has used the requested format in a well-organized structure, referencing always in correct format
Report Structure 2.5 Marks	Poorly organized; no report cover, no table of contents, and no page numbers	Typed; no report cover, and no table of contents; no use of colour	Typed; clean; neatly organized; no report cover, and no table of contents	Typed; clean; neatly organized with a well- designed report cover; effective use of colour	Exceptionally well typed; clean; neatly organized with a well- designed report cover; effective use of colour

Assessment 4 – Rubric Marking for Group Presentation (15%), Due week 11-12

Criteria	Fail (0 – 49%)	Pass (50 – 64%)	Credit (65 – 74%)	Distinction (75 – 84%)	High Distinction (85 – 100%)
Visual Appeal (Group) 2.5 Marks	There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. The slides were difficult to read, not proper color and font used, too much information been copied. No visual appeal.	There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information was contained on many slides. Minimal effort made to make slides, too much going on.	There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information on two or more slides. Significant visual appeal.	There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Visually appealing and engaging.	Professional looking presentation There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Visually appealing and very engaging.
Content (Group) 2.5 marks	The presentation provides a brief look at the topic but many questions are left unanswered, majority of information is irrelevant and significant points left out	The presentation Is informative but several elements are unanswered, much of the information irrelevant, coverage of some of major points	The presentation is a good summary of the topic, most important information covered, little irrelevant information	The presentation is a concise summary of the topic with all questions answered, comprehensive and complete coverage of information	Exceptionally good summary of the topic and provides extensive supportive elements to aid the ease of understanding of the audience
Preparedness/ participation/ group dynamics (Group) 3 marks	Unbalanced presentation or tension resulting from over-helping. multiple group members not participating, evident lack of preparation/ rehearsal, dependence on slides	Significant controlling by some members with one minimally contributing, primarily prepared but with some dependence on just reading off slides	Slight predominance of One presenter, Members help each other, very well prepared	All presenters know the information, participated equally and help each other as needed, extremely well prepared and rehearsed	Exceptionally good group dynamics, presentation would be considered professional
Presentation Skills (Individual) 7 marks	Minimal eye contact focusing on small part of audience, the audience is not engaged, spoke too quickly or quietly making it difficult to understand, poor body language	Focuses on only part of the audience, sporadic eye contact and the audience is distracted, speaker could be heard by only half of the audience, body language is distracting	Speaks to majority of the audience, steady eye contact, the audience is engaged by the presentation, speaks at a suitable volume, minor problems with body language eg. fidgeting	Regular/constant eye contact, the audience is engaged, and presenter held the audience’s attention, appropriate speaking volume and good body language	Professional presentation skills, excellent audience engagement

3.2   General information about assessment

1. Late Penalties and Extensions

An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. CompletingICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment tasks on time is a good way to master these habits.

Students who miss mid-trimester tests and final exams without a valid and accepted reason may not be granted a deferred exam and will be awarded 0 marks for the assessment item. Assessment items which are missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty unless there is a compelling reason (see below). These penalties are designed to encourage students to develop good time management practices, and to create equity for all students.

Any penalties applied will only be up to the maximum marks available for the specific piece of assessment attracting the penalty.

Late penalties, granting of extensions and deferred exams are based on the following:

In Class Tests and Quizzes (excluding Mid-Trimester Tests)

• Generally, extensions are not permitted. A make-up test may only be permitted under very special circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence of illness, hardship or unavoidable problems preventing completion of the assessment is provided (see section (b) below). The procedures and timing to apply for a make-up test (only if available) are as shown in the section Applying for an Extension (see below).
• Missing a class test will result in 0 marks for that assessment item unless the above applies.

WrittenICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assessments and Video Assessments

• There is a late penalty of 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is approved (see Applying for an Extension section below).

Presentations

• Generally, extensions are not permitted. Missing a presentation will result in 0 marks for that assessment item. The rules for make-up presentations are the same as for missing in-class tests (described above).

For group presentations, if serious circumstances prevent some members of the group from participating, the members of the group who are present should make their contributions as agreed. If a make-up presentation is approved, the other members of the group will be able to make their individual presentation later and will be marked according to the marking rubric. A video presentation may be used to facilitate the process.

Mid-Trimester Tests and Final Exams

If students are unable to attend mid-trimester tests or final exams due to illness, hardship or some other unavoidable problem (acceptable to KOI), they must:

• Complete the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form available by contacting [email protected] as soon as possible, but no later than three (3) working days after the exam date.
• Provide acceptable documentary evidence (see section (b) below).
• Agree to attend the deferred exam as set by KOI if a deferred exam is approved.

Deferred exam

• There will only be one deferred exam offered.
• Marks obtained for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that assessment item.
• If you miss the deferred exam you will be awarded 0 marks for the assessment item. This may mean you are unable to pass the subject.
• Applying for an Extension

If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, they must

• Complete the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form available by contacting [email protected] as soon as possible, but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date.
• Provide acceptable documentary evidence in the form of a medical certificate, police report or some other appropriate evidence of illness or hardship, or a technician’s report on problems with computer or communications technology, or a signed and witnessed statutory declaration explaining the circumstances.
• Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as practicable.

Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.

d)      Referencing and Plagiarism

Please remember that all sources used in assessment tasks must be suitably referenced.

Failure to acknowledge sources is plagiarism, and as such is a very serious academic issue. Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction in marks through to 0 marks for a first offence for a single ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serious repeat cases. Exclusion has serious visa implications. The easiest way to avoid plagiarising is to reference all sources.

Harvard referencing is the required method – in-text referencing using Author’s Surname (family name) and year of publication. A Referencing Guide, “Harvard Referencing”, and a Referencing Tutorial can be found on the right-hand menu strip in Moodle on all subject pages.

An effective way to reference correctly is to use Microsoft Word’s referencing function (please note that other versions and programs are likely to be different). To use the referencing function, click on the References Tab in the menu ribbon – students should choose Harvard.

Authorship is also an issue under plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group project. All students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessments online via Moodle, stating that the work submitted is their own original work.

The following are examples of academic misconduct and can attract severe penalties:

• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.
• Copying / cheating in tests and exams is academic misconduct. Such incidents will be treated just as seriously as other forms of plagiarism.
• Students who willingly allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied.

Where a subject coordinator considers that a student might have engaged in academic misconduct, KOI may require the student to undertake an additional oral exam as a part of the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment for the subject, as a way of testing the student’s understanding of their work.

Further information can be found on the KOI website.

e)Reasonable Adjustment

The Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (1992) makes it unlawful to treat people with a disability less fairly than people without a disability. In the context of this subject, the principle of Reasonable Adjustment is applied to ensure that participants with a disability have equitable access to all aspects of the learning for the subject. For assessment, this means that barriers to their demonstrating competence are removed wherever it is reasonably practical to do so.

Examples of reasonable adjustment in assessment may include:

• provision of an oral ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment, rather than a written assessment
• provision of extra time
• use of adaptive technology.

The focus of the adjusted assessment should be on enabling the student to demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes for the subject, rather than on the method of assessment.

f)        Appeals Process

Full details of the KOI Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy may be obtained in hard copy from the Library, and on the KOI website www.koi.edu.au under Policies and Forms.

Assessments and Mid-Trimester Exams:

Where students are not satisfied with the results of an assessment, including mid-trimester exams, they have the right to appeal. The process is as follows:

• Discuss the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION assessment with their tutor or lecturer – students should identify where they feel more marks should have been awarded – students should provide valid reasons based on the marking guide provided for the assessment. Reasons such as “I worked really hard” are not considered valid.
• If still not satisfied, students should complete an Application for Review of Assessment Marks form, clearly explaining the reasons for seeking a review. This form is available from the KOI website under Policies and Forms and is also available at KOI Reception (Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St). The completed Application for Review of Assessment Marks form should be submitted as explained on the form with supporting evidence attached to [email protected] .
• The form must be submitted within ten (10) working days of the return of the marked assessment, or within five (5) working days after the return of the assessment if the assessment is returned after the end of the trimester.

Review of Grade – whole of subject and final exams:

Where students are not satisfied with the results of the whole subject or with their final exam results, they have the right to request a Review of Grade – see the ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy for more information.

An Application for Review of Grade/Assessment Form (available from the KOI Website under Policies and Forms and from KOI Reception at Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St) should be completed clearly explaining the grounds for the application. The completed application should be submitted as explained on the form, with supporting evidence attached to [email protected] .

Visit:https://auspali.info/

Also visit:https://www.notesnepal.com/archives/767

For solution: +610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

For solution:

WhatsApp

+610482078788

+61482073403

+61482072848

[email protected]